Content Calendars: Do They Help or Hurt?
Published by When Notes Fly
https://whennotesfly.com/culture/creator-economy-media-culture/content-calendars-help-or-hurt
When Notes Fly article, fact-checked and corrected.
Who created and checked this page
Correction
Correction history
Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.
-
Corrected 4 citation errors: a fabricated '3.6 times more likely' statistic attached to Teresa Amabile's real Progress Principle research; implementation-intentions research misattributed to Roy Baumeister when it is actually Peter Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran's work, with an altered effect size (r=.55/90 studies vs the real d=0.65/94 studies), plus an unmentioned major replication controversy affecting Baumeister's ego-depletion theory; a historical-creative-productivity analysis misattributed to Adam Grant when the underlying research is Dean Keith Simonton's 'equal-odds rule' (Grant cites it in Originals but did not conduct the analysis); and a '20-40% of productive time' task-switching statistic misattributed to 'Mark et al., 2008' when it actually originates from Meyer, Evans, and Rubinstein's research.
BeforeArticle cited specific researchers and statistics for productivity and creativity research that were either fabricated, misattributed to the wrong researcher, or presented without disclosing a significant subsequent replication controversy.
AfterCorrected the Amabile statistic to match the real, verifiable finding; reattributed implementation-intentions research to Gollwitzer and Sheeran with the correct effect size, and added a note on the ego-depletion replication controversy; reattributed the historical-creative-productivity finding to Simonton; reattributed the task-switching statistic to Meyer, Evans, and Rubinstein.
Why: Real researchers were credited with each other's findings, one invented statistic was added, and a significant scientific controversy (ego-depletion's replication failure) was omitted - a mix of fabrication and citation-swapping errors found across this batch of legacy articles.
View the full record →
Full contribution timeline
-
Correction 29 July 2026
Emir Baycan: Corrected 4 citation errors: a fabricated '3.6 times more likely' statistic attached to Teresa Amabile's real Progress Principle research; implementation-intentions research misattributed to Roy Baumeister when it is actually Peter Gollwitzer and Paschal Sheeran's work, with an altered effect size (r=.55/90 studies vs the real d=0.65/94 studies), plus an unmentioned major replication controversy affecting Baumeister's ego-depletion theory; a historical-creative-productivity analysis misattributed to Adam Grant when the underlying research is Dean Keith Simonton's 'equal-odds rule' (Grant cites it in Originals but did not conduct the analysis); and a '20-40% of productive time' task-switching statistic misattributed to 'Mark et al., 2008' when it actually originates from Meyer, Evans, and Rubinstein's research.
Proof record →