Correction: Content Calendars: Do They Help or Hurt?
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 29 July 2026
The exact change
Article cited specific researchers and statistics for productivity and creativity research that were either fabricated, misattributed to the wrong researcher, or presented without disclosing a significant subsequent replication controversy.
Corrected the Amabile statistic to match the real, verifiable finding; reattributed implementation-intentions research to Gollwitzer and Sheeran with the correct effect size, and added a note on the ego-depletion replication controversy; reattributed the historical-creative-productivity finding to Simonton; reattributed the task-switching statistic to Meyer, Evans, and Rubinstein.
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
Real researchers were credited with each other's findings, one invented statistic was added, and a significant scientific controversy (ego-depletion's replication failure) was omitted - a mix of fabrication and citation-swapping errors found across this batch of legacy articles.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.