Only accepted work is recordedAboutGuidesContactSign in
CitePepCitePep
Contributors/Emir Baycan
EM

Emir Baycan

Verified
Software developer and platform founder · Istanbul, Turkey
Verified byEmail verifiedDomain ownershipID checked
Knowledge and educationTechnologySoftware development
Contribution score · points from accepted work▲ 160% in 12 months
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
312Contribution score+22 this monthPoints from accepted work
96%Trust score45 of 47 acceptedHow often publishers approve her work
47Accepted contributions+4 this monthReviews, corrections, sources and pages
ExpertLevelTop 3% in knowledge and educationEarned from accepted work, not self-declared
Accepted work · last 12 monthsLessMore
OctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep

Contribution history

All47Reviewed19Corrected14Authored9Sourced5
July 2026
Corrected·12 Jul·Owhennotesfly.comSoftware development projections explained32%37%EvidenceSourced·4 Jul·Owhennotesfly.comSoftware development projections explainedAdded the vendor migration guide WG1, ch. 9EvidenceReviewed·3 Jul·Cwhennotesfly.comLanguage adoption trends, 202414 claims · 1 changedEvidence
June 2026
Reviewed·21 Jun·Owhennotesfly.comOverthinking and Rumination9 claims · all supportedEvidence
May & April 2026
Authored·2 May·Cwhennotesfly.comHow the vendor guide scenarios are builtAuthorship confirmed by publisherEvidenceCorrected·18 Apr·Bbluewaters.exampleBuild caching: a primerBaseline 19901982–2011Evidence
Showing 6 of 47 · only work accepted by the page’s publisher is listedLoad older →
In the community

What she brings to the conversation

Emir Baycan answers questions and investigates flagged pages in two communities. Her most useful answers are shown first; several ended with a page corrected.

See all activity →
128helpful answers
41marked as expert answers
9threads that led to a fix
312thanks from members
Answers members found most helpful64c/technologyOpen problem· 2 JulDo these adoption statistics match the studies they cite?No, 3.2 mm is the 2022 sverage. AR6 gives 3.7 mm for 2006–2018, and the rate is accelerating. Cite the period with the figure.Expert answer2 sourcesLed to a correction on whennotesfly.com/native-vs-cross-platform-apps · accepted 30 Jul41c/explainersQuestion· 18 MarIs “fastest in 3,000 years” supported, or is it overstated?Supported. Kopp et al. (2016) reconstruct 3,000 years of sea level; the 20th-century rise is faster than any prior century in that record.Expert answer1 sourceResolvedConfirmed the claim, no change needed27c/technologySource· 1 JulAR6 WG1 chapter 9 gives the 2100 ranges, worth citing on explainersStarted by her27 repliesSource added to 3 pages across 2 publishers
Active inc/technologyModerator · since Mar 2026authority 91c/explainersMember · 38 answersauthority 84
Recognition
Top answerer, c/technologySeptember 2026
Thread to fix9 threads ended in an accepted change
WelcomerAnswered 20 first-time questions
Ask her a questionPost in c/technology and mention her, members with high authority are notified.

Votes and thanks sort answers and show appreciation. They never change her reputation, that comes only from work a publisher accepted.

How to read this profile

Every number here comes from work a publisher approved

Nobody can buy a score, set their own level or add work to their profile. It fills up only as publishers accept what she submits.

Contribution score
Points for each piece of accepted work. A full review earns more than adding one source. It only goes up when a publisher approves something.
Trust score
The share of her submitted work that publishers accepted. 45 of 47 means two proposals were declined; those stay private.
Topic authority
A 0–100 score for each subject, based on accepted work in that subject. It decides which requests she is matched to.
Level
Contributor, Trusted, Verified or Expert. Levels are reached through accepted work and trust score together.
The profile shows
Every piece of work a publisher accepted, with the page, date and evidence
Which publishers have trusted her work, and how often
How many manuscript reviews she completed, and how many on time
Any interests she has declared that could affect her judgement
It never shows
Work that publishers declined, it stays private to her
What her manuscript reviews said, those belong to the authors
Her fees, earnings or contact details
Anything she wrote before joining, unless she claimed and the publisher confirmed it
Publish pages on this topic? Invite her to review, correct or source a page. You see her work before anything goes live.How scores are calculated →
Illustrative profile.
Invite Emir Baycan to a pageShe sees the page, the task and your message. You still decide what to accept.
What it needs
Topic match: Knowledge and education · authority 84