What to Do When You Fail a Certification Exam
Correction General Cert Tips

What to Do When You Fail a Certification Exam

Corrected by Melik Can Sariyer · on Pass4Sure · 11 July 2026 · View published page ↗

Learn how to effectively manage exam retakes, analyze failures, and restructure your study plan for success.

The exact change

Before

"The candidates who pass on their retake are almost always the ones who spent the waiting period doing something different..." - Dawn Dunkerley, CISSP, author and chair of the (ISC)2 CISSP Item Development Committee. || "The pass rate on a first attempt for CISSP has hovered somewhere between twenty and thirty percent for over a decade..." - the Kalenux Team, synthesizing (ISC)2 community survey data and candidate interviews published in 2023-2024 [6]. || A 2011 study in Science by Ramirez and Beilock [7] found that students who spent 10 minutes before a high-stakes test writing about their anxieties showed significantly improved performance compared with controls.

After

The candidates who pass on their retake are almost always the ones who spent the waiting period doing something different, not more of the same... (unattributed, generalized). || The pass rate on a first attempt for CISSP has hovered somewhere between twenty and thirty percent for over a decade, according to community-reported estimates... (softened, unattributed). || A 2011 study in Science by Ramirez and Beilock [7] found that 9th-grade students who spent 10 minutes before a high-stakes classroom exam writing about their anxieties showed significantly improved performance compared with controls. Added a note that the study was conducted on classroom exams rather than professional certification exams, though the underlying mechanism is plausibly relevant to certification testing.

Suggested change

De-attributed 1 fabricated quote, softened 1 fabricated internal-synthesis claim, and corrected an overclaimed generalization of a real, accurately-cited study to note its actual study population.

Why this is better

De-attributed an unverified quote attributed to Dawn Dunkerley (no verifiable source) and softened an unverified internal-synthesis claim attributed to 'the Kalenux Team' citing a generic ISC2 URL that did not match the specific claim. Also corrected an overclaimed generalization of a real, accurately-cited study (Ramirez & Beilock, Science 2011): the study was genuinely conducted on 9th-grade classroom exams, not certification exams, so a note on the actual study population was added while keeping the real citation intact.

More by Melik Can Sariyer in General Cert Tips

All of Melik Can Sariyer's contributions →