Only accepted work is recordedAboutGuidesContactSign in
CitePepCitePep
Contributors/Melik Can Sariyer
MS

Melik Can Sariyer

Expert
Software Engineer and Linux OS Developer
TechnologyCertificationsAws CertificationsComptia CertificationsCybersecurity CertificationsGeneral Cert TipsAzure CertificationsCisco CertificationsCertification RoiGoogle Cloud Certifications
Contribution score · points from accepted work▲ 1016 points, 11 Jul to 30 Jul
11 Jul21 Jul30 Jul
1016Contribution scorefrom accepted workPoints from accepted work
98%Trust score254 of 254 acceptedHow often publishers approve this work
254Accepted contributionsaccepted to dateReviews, corrections, sources and pages
ExpertLevelEarned from accepted work

About Melik Can Sariyer

I am a software engineer who builds practical software and low-level systems, from full-stack web applications to embedded firmware and custom operating systems.

My core work spans operating systems and Linux, embedded systems, and full-stack development. I built StudentOS, a lightweight Linux distribution I designed to run smoothly on low-spec student devices, and I develop embedded projects on ESP32-S3 microcontrollers where memory, power, and timing constraints leave no room for sloppy code. On the application side I work across React, Node.js, Express and MongoDB, with additional experience in game development and test analysis.

I care about how things actually run, not just how they read on a slide: whether a build reproduces, whether a driver or dependency is real, whether an instruction works on the hardware and OS versions people actually use. That is the lens I bring to reviewing technical content.

Melik Can Sariyer's contribution history

All254Corrected254
  1. July 2026
  2. Corrected·30 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyNative vs Cross-Platform Apps: Choosing the Best FitWas Article included headcount and feature-parity statistics for Shopify's React Native migration that could not be verified, attributed Airbnb's 'React…Now Rewrote all three case studies to preserve the real, verifiable facts (Mustafa Ali's actual role at Shopify, Shopify's actual published code-sharing… Evidence
  3. Corrected·30 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyUnderstanding the DevOps Culture in Modern TeamsWas Article presented deployment-frequency multiples from the 2017 DORA State of DevOps Report as current 2023 findings, overstated the relationship…Now Replaced the stale 2017 multiples with an accurately hedged description of the consistent multi-year DORA pattern, corrected the Edmondson/DORA… Evidence
  4. Corrected·30 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyAgile Manifesto: Principles of Modern Software DevelopmentWas Article embellished an Association for Project Management survey finding, attached a specific precise productivity figure to Jeff Sutherland's book…Now Softened the APM claim to match its actual published finding, replaced Sutherland's specific figure with an accurate description of his book's… Evidence
  5. Corrected·30 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyExploring the Many Aspects of a Software EngineerReviewed the software-engineer overview from a practicing full-stack and systems developer standpoint. Evidence
  6. Corrected·30 Jul·CCertoJobCompTIA A+ Core 2 (220-1102): Operating Systems Domain -- Windows, macOS, LinuxReviewed the Linux portion of the Operating Systems domain from a hands-on Linux standpoint. Evidence
  7. Corrected·30 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyUnderstanding AI and Machine Learning FundamentalsWas Article credited AlexNet primarily to 'Geoffrey Hinton's AlexNet,' when the real lead developers were Alex Krizhevsky and Ilya Sutskever, with Hinton…Now AlexNet passage corrected to credit Krizhevsky and Sutskever as lead developers with Hinton as supervisor. Evidence
  8. Corrected·29 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyThe Process of DNS Resolution UncoveredWas Article attributed an unverified '40-60% RTT reduction' statistic to a real 2014 Sitaraman et al.Now Sitaraman citation reframed to describe the chapter's real content without the unverified statistic. Evidence
  9. Corrected·29 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyCode Quality: What Makes Good Code?Was Article attributed a widely-repeated but untraceable '100:1 defect cost ratio' to a real-sounding 'IBM Systems Sciences Institute' study that traces…Now IBM statistic reframed as a commonly-repeated but unverifiable industry estimate rather than a real replicating study, alongside the real Boehm… Evidence
  10. Corrected·29 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyWhy Analysts Spend 80% of Their Time Cleaning Bad DataWas Article attributed a specific real-sounding statistic to a specific named expert and publication venue that could not be verified as the actual…Now Corrected the attribution to the real source (Fetzer and Graeber's study) and the real metric it measured (additional infections, not contacts not… Evidence
  11. Corrected·29 Jul·WWhen Notes FlyAutomation Design Principles for Reliable WorkflowsWas Article presented four detailed, precisely quantified case studies as if drawn from real published sources at Shopify, Zapier, Square, and DORA.Now Each case was generalized into an accurate description of the real, well-documented underlying pattern (modular design reducing failure blast radius,… Evidence
See all 254 contributions →
How to read this profile

Every number here comes from work a publisher approved

Nobody can buy a score, set their own level or add work to their profile. It fills up only as publishers accept what they submit.

Contribution score
Points for each piece of accepted work. A full review earns more than adding one source. It only goes up when a publisher approves something.
Trust score
The share of their submitted work that publishers accepted. Anything a publisher declined stays private and is never shown here.
Topic authority
A 0–100 score for each subject, based on accepted work in that subject. It decides which requests they are matched to.
Level
Contributor, Trusted, Verified or Expert. Levels are reached through accepted work and trust score together.
The profile shows
Every piece of work a publisher accepted, with the page, date and evidence
Which topics they have proven authority in, based on accepted work
Their contribution score and trust score, both derived from accepted work
It never shows
Work that publishers declined: it stays private to them
Their fees, earnings or contact details
Anything they wrote before joining, unless they claimed and the publisher confirmed it
Publish pages on this topic? Invite them to review, correct or source a page. You see their work before anything goes live.How scores are calculated →