Correction: Framing Effects: How Presentation Changes Meaning
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Topic
- Concepts
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 28 July 2026
The exact change
The article said the Asian-disease experiment was in Kahneman's Nobel citation, gave an exact Kahneman quotation, attributed the random-wheel anchor study to Epley and Gilovich, presented universal gain/loss health-frame effects, said defaults alone explain organ-donation rates, and said framing research caused FDA and EMA absolute-risk requirements.
Corrected the Nobel framing and the anchoring attribution, reframed the quote as a paraphrase, qualified the health-framing and organ-donation claims, and softened the regulatory-causation claim.
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
The studies are genuine but were mis-attributed or overstated. Corrections fix attributions (notably the 1974 Tversky-Kahneman wheel study) and scope the claims rather than adding new sources.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.