Only accepted work is recordedAboutGuidesContactSign in
CitePepCitePep
Publishers/whennotesfly.com
OD

whennotesfly.com

Verified publisher
Climate & ocean science explainers · on record since Jan 2025
Verified byDomain ownershipNamed editorCorrection policy
CommunicationExplainersCommunication
Accepted work per monthReviewsCorrectionsSources
ONDJFMAMJJAS
28Pages on record+3 this quarterPages with a public history
9Contributors credited4 in climate scienceExperts named on its pages
14Corrections acceptedall logged publiclyErrors fixed, old text kept
2.4 daysMedian decisiontop 20% of sitesTime to accept or decline a proposal

Pages on record

Each ring shows how many of the page’s factual claims a specialist has checked. Below 100% means some claims are still waiting.
100%Overthinking and rumination projections explainedCommunication·4 contributions·updated 9 AugEBMSSI100%Overthinking and Rumination, 2024Explainers·3 contributions·updated 3 JulEBKT80%Regional ice extent, 2025Communication·2 contributions·updated 21 JunEB60%A disputed thresholdCommunication·2 contributions·updated 9 JunLBRM40%Ocean acidification explainedChemistry·1 contributions·updated 28 MayKT
Showing 5 of 28All pages →

Latest corrections

Corrected9 AugGlobal baseline ratethe published rate/yr→the current rate/yrby Contributor B
Corrected18 AprHeatwave baseline1990→1982–2011by Contributor A
In the community

How whennotesfly.com responds when its pages are questioned

When members flag one of its pages, the publisher answers from its official account and decides on any correction. This is its public track record.

See all activity →
31threads about its pages
27official responses
1.4 daysmedian time to respond
12fixes accepted from threads
Recent threads about its pages38c/explainersOpen problem· 2 JulIs this figure still the right one to cite?Official response · whennotesfly.comThanks, our explainer uses an older average. We’ve received a correction and will decide this week.Flagged by Contributor BCorrection accepted 9 Aug · page updated19c/explainersQuestion· 21 SepDoes the Regional ice page mix up the 2012 and 2025 minimums?Official response · whennotesfly.comYes, the September figure is the 2012 record low. Correction under review.Flagged by E. BaycanCorrection pending · decision due 26 Sep11c/explainersDiscussion· 3 days agoShould explainers state the baseline next to each projection?Flagged by E. BaycanOpen · no official response yet
Open requests from this publisherRequestReview six snowpack pagesCommunication · 4 days leftRequestSource the ocean-heat explainerExplainers · 9 days left
Its community commitments
Responds to every flag within 3 working days
Links each accepted fix back to its thread
Discloses when staff post personally
Spotted something on its pages?Flag it in c/explainers. The publisher is notified.

Official responses are posted by the publisher’s verified account. A thread never changes a page: only the publisher’s acceptance does.

How to read this profile

A publisher’s record shows how it checks its work, not whether you should agree with it

Every number comes from contributions the publisher accepted on its own pages. CitePep doesn’t rate, rank or endorse publishers.

It tells you
Which of its pages have been checked by named specialists, and how much of each
How quickly it fixes errors once they are pointed out
Which experts it trusts in each topic
That every correction keeps the old wording on record
What it leaves open
That the whole site is accurate: pages not listed here have not been checked
That CitePep endorses its views or editorial choices
How many proposals it declined, or why: those stay private
Anything about advertising, funding or ownership
If you’re a readerCheck a page before relying on it: open its record to see who checked it and when.
If you’re an expertSee how this publisher treats contributions: it decides in about 2.4 days and accepts 91% of reviews.
If you run another siteSee what a complete record looks like: every page reviewed, every correction public.
Illustrative profile.