Understanding Complexity in Systems: A Beginner's Guide
Published by When Notes Fly
https://whennotesfly.com/explainers/beginner-guides/what-is-complexity-beginner-overview
When Notes Fly article, fact-checked and corrected.
Who created and checked this page
Correction
Correction history
Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.
-
Corrected 5 fabricated citations attaching invented precise statistics to real people, companies, and events: a fabricated 2002 Eli Lilly internal analysis and 2013 Drug Information Association presentation with invented Phase II failure-rate figures; a fabricated Federal University of Parana 2020 Transportation Research Record study on Curitiba's transit resilience with invented statistics; fabricated precision statistics (60 percent, 60-70 percent) attached to Didier Sornette's real dragon-king theory, whose actual crash-prediction track record is disputed rather than quantified; a fabricated 2003 SARS-specific Bar-Yam study with an invented statistic, when his real relevant work on differentiated epidemic response is from the COVID-19 era; and an imprecise/fabricated detail in the well-documented 2003 Northeast Blackout report (real figure is approximately 55 million affected, and the cascade collapsed within minutes, not over '52 events across 2 hours 11 minutes').
BeforeArticle cited specific studies, presentations, and statistics for real companies, researchers, and events that, on independent verification, do not exist or materially misrepresent the documented timeline/findings.
AfterRemoved the fabricated study citations and invented statistics while preserving the real underlying facts (Lilly's real adaptive-trial-design push, Curitiba's real transit design philosophy, Sornette's real precursor-signal research, Bar-Yam's real COVID-era policy analysis, and the blackout's real scale and cascading-failure mechanism).
Why: Real researchers, companies, and events were used as anchors for invented studies, conference presentations, and statistics - the Barabasi-Albert 1999 Science paper and the P&G/Lafley/Huston-Sakkab 2006 HBR citation in the same article both verified as fully accurate.
View the full record →
Full contribution timeline
-
Correction 29 July 2026
Emir Baycan: Corrected 5 fabricated citations attaching invented precise statistics to real people, companies, and events: a fabricated 2002 Eli Lilly internal analysis and 2013 Drug Information Association presentation with invented Phase II failure-rate figures; a fabricated Federal University of Parana 2020 Transportation Research Record study on Curitiba's transit resilience with invented statistics; fabricated precision statistics (60 percent, 60-70 percent) attached to Didier Sornette's real dragon-king theory, whose actual crash-prediction track record is disputed rather than quantified; a fabricated 2003 SARS-specific Bar-Yam study with an invented statistic, when his real relevant work on differentiated epidemic response is from the COVID-19 era; and an imprecise/fabricated detail in the well-documented 2003 Northeast Blackout report (real figure is approximately 55 million affected, and the cascade collapsed within minutes, not over '52 events across 2 hours 11 minutes').
Proof record →