AI Ethics Policy

Key Concerns in AI Ethics and Societal Impact

Published by When Notes Fly

https://whennotesfly.com/technology/ai-machine-learning/ai-ethics-societal-impact

When Notes Fly article, fact-checked and corrected.

Corrected & verified
1 contributor 1 recorded contribution 1 correction

Who created and checked this page

Correction history

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

  1. 29 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

    Corrected inflated and misattributed statistics in the article's automation-and-employment section: Acemoglu and Restrepo's real 2020 robots-and-jobs study found a 0.2 percentage point employment decline and 0.42 percent wage decline per robot per thousand workers, not the '0.4 percent' and '0.8 percent' figures cited (roughly double the real numbers); and the article's claimed 2024 Acemoglu/Restrepo AI-specific follow-up study with '2.1 to 3.3 percent' lower employment growth does not exist. The real 2024/2025 AI-and-commuting-zones study is by Bonfiglioli, Crino, Gancia, and Papadakis, with an actual headline effect of 0.6 percentage points.

    Before

    Article cited specific employment and wage statistics for real, well-known economists' research that were roughly double the actual published figures, and attributed a nonexistent 2024 study to the wrong research team.

    After

    Corrected the 2020 Acemoglu/Restrepo statistics to match their real published figures; replaced the fabricated 2024 Acemoglu/Restrepo AI study with the real Bonfiglioli/Crino/Gancia/Papadakis study and its actual finding.

    Why: Real economists' well-known research was cited with statistics inflated roughly twofold, plus a fabricated follow-up study attributed to the wrong authors - the Mayson/Chouldechova and Frey/Osborne/Arntz-Gregory-Zierahn citations in the same article verified as accurate.

    View the full record →

Full contribution timeline

  1. Correction 29 July 2026

    Emir Baycan: Corrected inflated and misattributed statistics in the article's automation-and-employment section: Acemoglu and Restrepo's real 2020 robots-and-jobs study found a 0.2 percentage point employment decline and 0.42 percent wage decline per robot per thousand workers, not the '0.4 percent' and '0.8 percent' figures cited (roughly double the real numbers); and the article's claimed 2024 Acemoglu/Restrepo AI-specific follow-up study with '2.1 to 3.3 percent' lower employment growth does not exist. The real 2024/2025 AI-and-commuting-zones study is by Bonfiglioli, Crino, Gancia, and Papadakis, with an actual headline effect of 0.6 percentage points.

    Proof record →