Concepts

Framework Overload: Managing Mental Models Effectively

Published by When Notes Fly

https://whennotesfly.com/concepts/frameworks-models/framework-overload-explained

When Notes Fly article, fact-checked and corrected.

Corrected & verified
1 contributor 1 recorded contribution 1 correction

Who created and checked this page

Correction history

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

  1. 28 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan

    Removed five unverifiable, apparently fabricated studies (attributed to Potocnik/Edinburgh, Graber/SUNY, Finkelstein/Dartmouth, a 2022 McKinsey survey of 750 tech companies, and a 1984 GM/McKinsey study) that carried specific institutions, sample sizes and statistics with no locatable citation. Replaced each with general, source-free statements of the same qualitative point.

    Before

    The article cited a 2018 Potocnik study (14 firms), a 2015 Graber study (583 diagnostic errors), a 2020 Finkelstein study (45 companies, 62% vs 38%), a 2022 McKinsey survey (750 technology companies, 67%), and a 1984 GM/McKinsey study (35% of managers' time), each with precise figures but no verifiable source.

    After

    Removed the fabricated attributions and invented statistics; retained the qualitative claim (beyond a moderate framework repertoire, added frameworks stop improving and can degrade decision quality) as general, unattributed statements. Retained the genuinely documented history (Mintzberg's Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, 1960s-70s corporate planning systems, GM/Sloan/Toyota).

    Why: These studies could not be located in any database or the cited journals and carry the signature of fabricated AI-generated citations (specific institution + sample + result, no retrievable source). Editorial policy is to remove invented sources rather than substitute new ones.

    View the full record →

Full contribution timeline

  1. Correction 28 July 2026

    Emir Baycan: Removed five unverifiable, apparently fabricated studies (attributed to Potocnik/Edinburgh, Graber/SUNY, Finkelstein/Dartmouth, a 2022 McKinsey survey of 750 tech companies, and a 1984 GM/McKinsey study) that carried specific institutions, sample sizes and statistics with no locatable citation. Replaced each with general, source-free statements of the same qualitative point.

    Proof record →