Correction: Problem-First MVP Strategies
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 29 July 2026
The exact change
Article cited specific researchers, institutions, journals, and statistics for design-thinking and product-failure research that, on independent verification, were either entirely invented or real frameworks/figures dressed up with fabricated precision and false attribution.
Removed the fabricated Bohmer/Lewrick study details while preserving Lewrick's real, general published findings; stripped invented statistics from the real McGrath citation; corrected the Christensen citation to his real, verifiable Jobs-to-Be-Done distinction rather than the fabricated specific study; corrected the Fadell/Nest thermostat statistic's attribution to its real source (ACEEE data) rather than personal research.
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
Real experts, books, and statistics were used as anchors for invented specifics (fake co-authors, fake studies, fabricated percentages) or misattributed real data, the same fabrication pattern found across this batch of legacy articles.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.