Correction: Leverage Points in Systems
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Topic
- Concepts
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 28 July 2026
The exact change
The article said TOU pricing cut peak demand 15-30%, that Soviet metric goals were the sole root cause, that the Montreal Protocol succeeded through paradigm shift not rules, cited a Grubb 2021 18-country ranking, and said Hanushek proves accountability is higher leverage than spending.
Qualified the TOU, Soviet, and Hanushek claims, corrected the Montreal Protocol mechanism, and generalized the unverifiable Grubb specifics.
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
Several figures and the Grubb citation were overstated or unverifiable, and the Montreal Protocol characterization was backwards. Corrections scope the claims and correct the mechanism rather than adding new sources.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.