Focus vs Multitasking: The Real Cost of Switching Tasks
Correction Work Skills

Focus vs Multitasking: The Real Cost of Switching Tasks

Corrected by Emir Baycan · on When Notes Fly · 31 July 2026 · View published page ↗

Multitasking is ineffective, task switching leads to diminished focus and increased cognitive load.

What was corrected

What the page claimed

The article attributed a well-known '40 percent productivity loss' statistic to the American Psychological Association as an institutional estimate, when the figure actually comes from psychologist David Meyer and is merely hosted on the APA's website. It described a real 2001 University of Michigan study as a neuroimaging study, when it was actually a behavioral study measuring reaction times, and omitted one of its three real authors. It cited a specific '23 minutes and 15 seconds' recovery time from an interruption, attributed to Gloria Mark's research, a figure that could not be verified in her real peer-reviewed work, which instead found that interrupted workers tended to compensate by working faster rather than taking longer to fully re-engage. It also cited an unattributed 'Journal of Experimental Psychology' study without any author or year, too vague to verify.

What was corrected

The article now correctly attributes the 40 percent figure to David Meyer's own statement, describes the 2001 University of Michigan study accurately as behavioral research measuring reaction times and includes its third author, describes Gloria Mark's real research findings while noting that the specific 'twenty-three minutes' figure often associated with her work traces to media interviews rather than her peer-reviewed publications, and rephrases the vague citation to avoid implying a single specific, unverifiable study.

Why this is better

Web searches confirmed that the large majority of this article's citations, including the well-known Stanford multitasking study and the University of Utah driving research, matched the real published record precisely. A small number of specific details, an attribution, a research methodology, a widely circulated but unverifiable statistic, and an overly vague citation, needed correction, which was done while preserving the accurate content around them.

More by Emir Baycan in Work Skills

All of Emir Baycan's contributions →