Correction: Feedback Loops: Reinforcing vs Balancing Explained
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Topic
- Concepts
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 28 July 2026
The exact change
The article presented the Kaibab deer collapse as a settled predator-removal case with precise population figures, and said Therac-25 directly shaped IEC 62304.
Added the ecological debate over the Kaibab figures and softened the Therac-25/IEC 62304 causal claim to an informational influence rather than direct shaping.
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
The Kaibab case is more contested in later ecology literature than the textbook telling suggests, and the Therac-25/standard link is influence rather than direct causation. Corrections add nuance rather than adding new sources.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.