Correction: Decision Journaling for Better Judgment Over Time
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- When Notes Fly
- Topic
- Concepts
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 28 July 2026
The exact change
Hagger 2016 showed a significant depletion effect; parole-board data proves judges were depleted; decision-making reliably degrades subsequent judgment.
Hagger 2016 found NO significant depletion effect (d=0.04, 95% CI [-0.07,0.15]); the parole-board study is an observational association; sustained decision-making MAY degrade judgment but this is contested (36-lab null, d=0.06).
Suggested change
See before/after.
Why this is better
Independent fact-check against Hagger et al. 2016 (Perspect Psychol Sci), Danziger et al. 2011 (PNAS), and Vohs et al. 2021.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, When Notes Fly, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.