Exhibitor Experience and Service Design at European Trade Fairs: The 2026 Framework

Who created and checked this page

Correction history

Every accepted correction to this page is recorded with the exact change, so readers can see how the page improved over time.

1. 16 July 2026 · corrected by Emir Baycan
   Before

   UFI EX research suggests exhibitor experience scores explain 60-75% of variance in rebook decisions among major exhibitors, more than any other measurable variable including visitor attendance or pricing.

   After

   Industry exhibitor-satisfaction research suggests exhibitor experience scores are among the strongest predictors of rebook decisions among major exhibitors, alongside visitor attendance and pricing.

   Why: 3 issues fixed: Attributes a precise statistic ('exhibitor experience scores explain 60-75% of variance in rebook decisions among major exhibitors, more than any other measurable variable') to 'UFI EX research', a specifically-named research programme that is not verifiable as an actual formally-branded UFI research stream. The precise variance-explained figure reads as a fabricated statistic attached to an invented source name. | Cites 'UFI's 2024 EX (Exhibitor Experience) Research' as having 'found that exhibitor satisfaction scores predict rebook rates more reliably than visitor attendance numbers' - this specific named research and finding cannot be verified as an actual UFI publication. | Attributes a specific statistic to 'AUMA's 2024 Trends report' ('European exhibitor fair counts down approximately 18% versus 2019 while aggregate spend held roughly flat') that cannot be verified in AUMA's actual published Trends reports. AUMA's real published data (e.g. Exhibitor Outlook surveys) shows trade fair budget share of marketing budget rising to pre-pandemic levels, not a specific 18% decline in fair counts - this precise figure appears fabricated.

   View the full record →

Full contribution timeline

1. Correction 16 July 2026

   Emir Baycan

   Proof record →