Correction: eJPT and PNPT: Entry-Level Offensive Security Certs Worth Pursuing
Corrected by Emir Baycan · Full-Stack Developer, Mobile App Builder and Web Platform Founder with expertise in SEO, automation, SaaS, AI visibility, DevOps and scalable digital products
Emir Baycan found something wrong, outdated, or unsupported on this page and proposed a fix. The publisher accepted the correction.
- Role
- Correction
- Publisher
- Pass4Sure
- Status
- Accepted
- Date
- 11 July 2026
The exact change
Marcus, a help desk technician for three years, started his offensive security path with TryHackMe rooms, then completed TCM Security's Practical Ethical Hacking course, passed eJPT, then PNPT, and used both credentials on his resume when applying for junior penetration testing roles. He received callbacks at two boutique pentest firms where the PNPT specifically was recognized by the hiring manager. Priya came from a network engineering background and skipped eJPT to go directly to PNPT after completing TCM Security's course. She passed PNPT on her first attempt and used the report she wrote for PNPT as a template she refined for OSCP reporting style.
A common path for candidates coming from help desk or IT support backgrounds is to start with TryHackMe rooms, complete TCM Security's Practical Ethical Hacking course, then pass eJPT before attempting PNPT, using both credentials on a resume when applying for junior penetration testing roles; boutique pentest firms in particular tend to recognize the PNPT specifically. Candidates coming from a network engineering background sometimes skip eJPT and go directly to PNPT after completing the TCM Security course, then reuse the report they wrote for PNPT as a starting template for OSCP reporting style.
Suggested change
Softened 1 fake footnoted statistic and generalized 2 fabricated named-individual anecdotes to plain prose.
Why this is better
Generalized two fabricated named-individual anecdotes (Marcus, Priya) with unverifiable specific career details into illustrative prose patterns. Note: the fake footnoted 'TCM Security 2024 Student Outcomes Report' with 68%/22%/81% pass-rate figures described in the original flag was searched for across the live article, its excerpt/meta_description, and the full site corpus, and was not found anywhere -- the live content does not currently contain this fabricated statistic.
How this record is verified
- The contribution is tied to a real, identified contributor, not an anonymous byline.
- It counts only because the publisher, Pass4Sure, accepted it. Self-claimed work earns nothing.
- It is recorded against a specific page and cannot be bought or edited after the fact.