The journal
Good morning, Mira
Find verified reviewers for your journal’s peer review. CitePep makes the introduction; you invite and manage reviews in your own submission system.
What happened on your calls
LBReviewer A expressed interest in your call“Field surveys at 18 pages: happy to review thermal stress-recovery work.”Technical explainer ecology · authority 77 · 2dDecide →
AO4 reviewers replied to your announcement“Will the call extend to Indian Ocean sites?”c/marine-ecology · 1dReply →
Needs your decision Reviewers who expressed interest in your open calls5 waiting
EBContributor Afor Ocean acidification · 1d agoCommunication · carbonate chemistry88 topic authority4 reviews completed100% on time
KTReviewerfor Technical explainer ecology · 3d agoCoastal ecosystems · symbiont ecology78 topic authority9 reviews completed96% on time
See all 5 interested reviewers →Turnaround Median per stage, last 90 days · 23 manuscripts · vs marine ecology journals on CitePep1 reviewer late →
Find 2 reviewers6 hvs 5 days
First report13 daysvs 21 days
Both reports17 daysvs 26 days
Re-review of revision3 daysvs 14 days
Grey is the field median; blue is yours. Most of the gain comes from inviting 3 at once and the 48-hour standby.
Technical explainer ecologyOpenField methods · thermal stress · Pacific reefs · English · Closes 10 Oct1 of 2 invited4 interestedReview interest →
Ocean acidificationOpenCarbonate chemistry · modelling · English · Closes 18 Oct0 of 1 invited1 interestedReview interest →
Confirm completed reviews Confirming adds the review to the reviewer’s public count and on-time rate. Nothing about the review itself is shown.
R-MS-0412ReviewerDue 28 Sep
R-MS-2026-0418ReviewerDue 30 Sep