Several explainers use this line. My reading of AR6 is that 1.5°C is likely reached in the early 2030s, as a 20-year average. Is “by 2030” a fair simplification, or an error that should be corrected?
1. Quote the exact passage. 2. Say what a journal referee would ask. 3. Say why it matters for the conclusion. 4. Suggest the smallest change that would answer it. 5. Say if it could be answered without new data. Authors tell me the fifth one saves them the most time.
131
·the makerAuthor· 6h
Asking in general terms, not sharing my review. Is it enough to justify the selection and add a sensitivity analysis, or do referees usually expect more sites?
A popular explainer says the Regional will be ice-free in summer “by 2035”. My understanding is that projections give a range and depend on emissions. What is the accurate way to say this?
Needs an expert
21
·Author in EcologyAuthor· 2h
Mine is already nine pages for three majors. Is that normal, or does length itself annoy editors?
The key number comes from a 2018 paper that published a correction for a calculation error. The page shows the original figure. Needs someone to find the corrected range and draft the fix.
One hour, general questions only. Add yours below in advance: how to plan a response, when a limitation is enough, how long a response letter should be. I won’t discuss any specific manuscript, including ones I have reviewed.
We are looking for two reviewers with field experience in canopy stress on Pacific reefs. Single-blind, typical turnaround 21 days, review written in English. Express interest from our journal profile; our editors invite through our own submission system. We will not share manuscript details here or anywhere on CitePep.
When a reviewer we invited through CitePep delivers, our editors confirm whether it arrived on time. That confirmation is the only thing that changes the reviewer’s public record: their completed count and on-time rate. We never report what a review said or what we decided.
publisher.example/overthinking-and-rumination says baseline is rising “by about the published rate per year”. As far as I can tell that is the 1993–2010 average. Is there a more current figure the page should use?
Several baseline explainers say the current rise is the fastest in 3,000 years. It sounds like a headline. Is there a reconstruction that actually supports it?