Author account

Your review is in progress

Your reviewer is halfwayYour reviewer has finished the methods and results of “Thermal thresholds”5 findings drafted so far, on track for 29 September. You’ll be notified the moment it’s delivered.Due in6 daysTrack the review

What’s new for you

AYour reviewer reached “Findings drafted”5 findings so far · due 29 SepR-2041 · 2hTrack →

KTReviewer answered your anonymous question“A data-availability statement should name the repository, the identifier and any access limits.”c/peer-review-practice · 1dRead →

LBNew replies in a thread you followResponding to major findings2dAdd a question →

RYour reviewer answered your clarifying questionOn finding 2 of your August reportR-1987 · AugRead →

Order R-2041 · Communication · EnglishA disputed threshold in a published explainerDue 29 Sep · 6 days left

Described

Invited

Accepted

4In review

5Delivered

AReviewer ACommunication · 12 reviews · 100% on time

Latest reportR-1987 · delivered 2 AugOpen report PDF

2Major

3Minor

1Note

MAJOR · Methods §2.3Symbiont clade was assigned from a single sampling point. A referee will likely ask for repeat sampling.

You have 1 clarifying question left for this report.

All papers

R-2041A disputed thresholdIn review$420

R-1987Heat stress and symbiont shuffling in AcroporaDelivered$380

R-1902Remote sensing of source accuracy, 2016–2023Delivered$450

Move your work fasterNew

Paper workspaceTrack findings, run the checklist, share with a journal.Review a preprintGet a private expert review of your preprint.Ask for a replicationPost a call for other labs to repeat a key result.Record a null resultSave other labs months of repeating it.

Your paperslast 30 days

3papers reviewed

17findings you acted on

2reviewers you thanked

From the communityLive

Ask how to write, revise and respond: anonymously if you prefer.

DiscussionResponding to major findings in ecology papersIn c/peer-review-practiceRemind me →Your questionNew answerHow much detail should a data-availability statement have?Anonymous · 2 expert answersRead →QuestionIs it acceptable to cite a preprint for a key method?c/peer-review-practice · 11 repliesRead →

Describe the issue in general words, keeping your review private.

Open community →

Payment · R-2041

Held18 Sep

Fee frozen at $42020 Sep

Released to revieweron delivery

Late after 29 Sep? Cancel for a full refund.

Before you resubmit

Address both major findingsAcknowledge Cunning (2015) and Silverstein (2017)Add the colony count (n = 64) to the abstract

Only you can see these reportsIt stays with you and reaches a journal only if you attach it.