Invite verified specialists to check any page on your site. You approve each change, and readers see a short box naming who checked it. Start with three pages for a fixed price, so you can see the result before committing.
Start with three pages →Claim pages you wrote, review and correct others, and keep a public record of accepted work under your own name. Free.
Create a profile →An independent expert in your field reads your manuscript before you submit and tells you what a referee would raise. From $300.
Describe your paper →Set your own fee, fields and languages. Paid the same for every completed review. Your completed-review count and on-time record build your reviewer profile; the reviews themselves stay confidential.
Join the reviewer pool →Search authors by the pages their byline is verified on, experts by topic authority, or peer reviewers by field, method and language.
Browse directories →Every page with a contribution history: who wrote it, who checked it, what was corrected and when. Open to everyone.
See pages on record →Publishers add a short attribution block to any page. It names who wrote, reviewed, edited or corrected it, and each name leads to a public profile with a verifiable history of accepted work. Experts who review and correct other people's pages receive that credit under their own name, on a profile they keep as they move between institutions and publishers.
A verified expert in your field reads your manuscript the way a journal’s reviewer would, and tells you (point by point, quoting your text) what is likely to be questioned and how serious each point is. You get this before any journal sees the paper, so you can fix problems first. Reviewers are matched on field and language from outside your institution, and you see who matches before you pay.
For web pages, the publisher approves each contribution before it appears. For manuscripts, the review goes privately to the author; the only public fact is that the reviewer completed it, and whether on time.
List the topics you know. Your public profile is live immediately.
Flag wrong information, propose the exact fix, or confirm what is right. Any page on the web.
The editor who controls the page decides. Only accepted work counts and appears on the record.
The contribution is attributed to you, and your scores and topic authority recalculate.
Confirm you own the domain with a meta tag or file. Agencies manage many sites from one account.
Review, edit, correction or source, for an article, a product spec or documentation.
Invite a specific contributor by topic authority, or open the request to qualified experts.
Approve what you want. Accepted contributors appear in the attribution block on your page.
Abstract, field, and the language the review must be written in.
Matched on field and language from outside your institution. You see the pool before paying.
Up to three are invited; the first to accept takes it. The fee is frozen the moment they accept.
Specific, quoted, graded by severity, and private to you.
Every answer comes from a verified person with a visible record in the topic, and a good thread ends with the page corrected.
Everything else on CitePep builds on these.
For papers, we connect authors with independent experts who give private feedback before submission. Publishing decisions stay with journals.
Every contributor and reviewer is verified before their work can count, by ORCID, an institutional email, or an identity check. Their profile shows which checks they passed.
Contributors propose changes; the publisher reads each one and decides. You edit your own page. CitePep only records what you approved.
Scores come only from work a publisher accepted. Scores reflect work alone, and reviewers are paid the same whatever their review concludes.
It stays with you, and reaches a journal only if you attach it. The reviewer’s profile shows how many reviews they completed and how often on time.
Publishers pay per reviewed page, from $49. Authors pay the reviewer’s own fee, usually $300–600, only after a reviewer accepts.
A CitePep profile is built from accepted work. It shows what a person has actually contributed, where it was accepted, which topics they have earned authority in, and, for reviewers, how reliably they deliver.
Tell us who you are and we'll show you what your account does before you create it. Accounts are kept separate so every manuscript goes to an independent reviewer, and you may hold more than one.
Questions first? Talk to us →